How can Wasteland be a Replica of Disneyland if Yen Sid created it before Mickey's cartoon debut? If Mickey caused the Thinner disaster before his debut, then why is Horace Horsecollar shown in a flashback of Wasteland before the disaster? If 1920s Horace and Clarabelle are in Wasteland, then what happened when they appeared in Kingdom Hearts II? Do they just briefly leave Wasteland and come back later? If characters go to Wasteland when they become forgotten, then how did a random 1920s Cow extra manage to survive for so long?! Why do the Beetleworx reference characters like Ursula and Hades if the rest of the characters are supposed to be based around the Walt Era?

Don't get too excited about the new Visual Editor update. It hasn't come to our wiki yet, but it's super slow and not too well built like the last version. It also makes wikis a bit harder to navigate. And why is the discussion tab gone again? It makes no sense to have it hidden under the wordmark.

How are you guys?

Anyone else ever noticed that before?

The wiki has been lonely.

Just editing a video with headphones just to hear what those little freaks had to say. 0_0

Someone put a link to the old Epic Mickey: Path Painter on the matching article! If you haven't already, play it!

I found these old concept art pieces online. I've seen them before and you probably have too, but what are they of? It looks like a giant steam barge or a oil drill.

https://twitter.com/AlexWebsters/status/1236778456031117312?s=20

Interesting thread from one of the animators who was working on the short-lived Epic Donald project. The fact that there's likely a pitch out there for both Epic Donald and the Epic Mickey movie that Warren Spector proposed is fascinating, but the fact that they'll probably never see the light of day is going to eternally drive me insane.

Epic Mickey opened up some new ideas about Toons and their existence, but we have already seen things like this before in comics, movies, and certain video games. So, in theory, how does the Toon world work? Is it like some writers have proposed (I'm thinking of Floyd Gottfredson), where the characters work for Disney once they are created, or is it like Warren Spector said, where the characters don't know that they're in a cartoon?

I'm currently prototyping a new version of the Applicable Games template and am wondering what you guys think before I put it into production. Instead of having the template in the main article body, it saves space by using JavaScript to put it up in the article title bar, similar to the way that Wookieepedia handles the canon/legends indicator. It is completely compatible with the existing format of {{Applicable Games|0|0|0}} and serves the same purpose. Would do guys be okay with something like this being implemented?

When you first played Epic Mickey, it was a one-of-a-kind experience, huh? Well, not so much! Apparently there was an old game called Mickey Mouse Mania in which Mickey goes through a bunch of old cartoons to save his former incarnations. It's a visually beautiful game, and for the SNES, it's incredible.

But what makes it like Epic Mickey is the classic cartoons. Many of the projectors in EM are similar to Mania's, and the Mad Doc is even a boss! If you've got an SNES or Sega around, you should definitely try this rare masterpiece. It's a lot like the more well-known Castle of Illusion.

Better camera? Darker music? Creepier characters? More intense bosses? How about voice acting? Or maybe you'd prefer a lighter atmosphere? Give me your thoughts!

Looking for opinions on what should be done with the NPC pages, specifically the "civilians" (dogs, goats, cows, horses). I'm planning on doing a sweep of them, adding a new infobox, adding images, and cleaning things up. Wondering what you guys think should be done with the Epic Mickey 2 sections.

As you probably already know, Epic Mickey 2 drops most of the NPC names and opts for names like "Male Dog". Currently, many of the articles for Epic Mickey NPCs contain the Epic Mickey 2 NPC category and a section that says something along the lines of "though this character is not named in Epic Mickey 2, it can be assumed that they're one of the generic NPCs". Examples: Abner, Rufus McBark, Ezra.

My problems with this are that this is very speculative, can be misleading with the Applicable Games template and Epic Mickey 2 category, and the fact that this isn't consistent with the way Gremlins are handled (no such section exists on most Gremlin pages despite the fact that they're also generically named in the sequel).

What do you guys think? Do you think the Epic Mickey 2 section and category should be kept on first game NPC pages, or should I remove it when I clean things up?

Another dumb question... Is the new hit indie game series, Bendy and the Ink Machine, have roots in Epic Mickey? For those who don't know, the first game in the series is a survival/ light horror game about a retired animator who returns to the supposedly abandoned animation studio where he used to make cartoons. In reality, though, his former boss wants to trap him in a living 1930's cartoon nightmare. It's supposed to scare you out of your marbles, but it really is a puzzle game that is a tribute to the 1930's and classic cartoons, much like Epic Mickey is.

But the way that Bendy is most like Epic Mickey is in its dark portrayal of old films, and even Disney rides (one boss battle is against a Dumbo-like ride.). The main enemies of the game are Ink Creatures spawned by the deadly Ink Machine, and they're called Searchers, which sounds like Spatter, Slobber, etc.

So- a game based on classic Disney gone mad. Sound familiar?